Population density of cougars by study (individuals per 100 square kilometers)
| Researcher | Location | Method | Minimum density | Maximum density | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Ian Ross and Martin G. Jalkotzy | Alberta (Canada) | radio-collar tracking | 2.70 | 4.70 | 2.00 |
| Gregory A. Davidson et al. | Oregon (United States) | scat-detecting dogs | 2.31 | 5.50 | 3.19 |
| David M. Choate et al. | Utah (United States) | helicopter surveying | 5.59 | 10.24 | 4.65 |
| Rahel Sollmann et al. | Florida (United States) | infrared camera trapping, GPS tracking of collars | 1.46 | 1.51 | 0.05 |
Researchers have used several different methods to determine the population density of cougars (Puma concolor). A student claims that the use of scat-detecting dogs produces the most precise results, with the smallest difference between minimum and maximum densities.