Back to forum
Verbal·Information and Ideas·Command of Evidence
medium
Studies of Cougar Population Density
Study authorsStudy publication yearLocationMinimum density (cougars per 100 square kilometers)Maximum density (cougars per 100 square kilometers)
David M. Choate et al.2006Utah (United States)5.5910.24
Randy D. Johnson2017North Dakota (United States)0.452.78
A.J. Noss et al.2012Bolivia0.367.99
K.M. Proffitt et al.2015Montana (United States)3.205.60
Studies of the population density of cougars (Puma concolor) have yielded a range of results, which may in part reflect natural variations in the resources that cougars need to survive. For example, the difference between the maximum population density reported by Randy D. Johnson and that reported by David M. Choate et al. may indicate that       
Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the example?
A
cougar habitat makes up a greater proportion of the overall land area in Utah than is the case in North Dakota.
B
the cougar habitat in North Dakota cannot support as many individuals as can the cougar habitat in Utah.
C
the cougar habitat in Montana can support more than 3.20 individuals per 100 square kilometers.
D
there are more cougars overall in both Bolivia and Montana than there are in North Dakota.