Studies of Cougar Population Density
| Study authors | Location | Methods | Study area (square kilometers) | Maximum density (cougars per 100 square kilometers) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randy D. Johnson | North Dakota (United States) | radio-collar tracking | 6,467 | 2.78 |
| Gregory A. Davidson et al. | Oregon (United States) | scat-detecting dogs | 1,225 | 5.50 |
| Juan I. Zanón-Martínez et al. | Argentina | regular camera trapping | 1,179 | 4.90 |
| David M. Choate et al. | Utah (United States) | helicopter surveying | 1,300 | 10.24 |
Studies of the population density of cougars (Puma concolor) have yielded a range of results, which may in part reflect differences in the effectiveness of the methods that researchers have used in their studies. If, for example, the use of helicopter surveying tends to lead to overestimates of cougar population density, that may explain why the study by __________