Back to forum
Verbal·Information and Ideas·Command of Evidence
hard
Studies of Cougar Population Density
Study authorsLocationMethodsStudy area (square kilometers)Maximum density (cougars per 100 square kilometers)
Randy D. JohnsonNorth Dakota (United States)radio-collar tracking6,4672.78
Gregory A. Davidson et al.Oregon (United States)scat-detecting dogs1,2255.50
Juan I. Zanón-Martínez et al.Argentinaregular camera trapping1,1794.90
David M. Choate et al.Utah (United States)helicopter surveying1,30010.24
Studies of the population density of cougars (Puma concolor) have yielded a range of results, which may in part reflect differences in the effectiveness of the methods that researchers have used in their studies. If, for example, the use of helicopter surveying tends to lead to overestimates of cougar population density, that may explain why the study by __________
Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the example?
A
Juan I. Zanón-Martínez et al. required a study area of 1,179 square kilometers, while the study by David M. Choate et al. required a study area of 1,300 square kilometers.
B
David M. Choate et al. reported a maximum density of 10.24 individuals per 100 square kilometers, higher than that reported by several other studies.
C
Randy D. Johnson reported a maximum density of only 2.78 individuals per 100 square kilometers, lower than that reported by several other studies.
D
Gregory A. Davidson et al. reported a maximum density of 5.50 individuals per 100 square kilometers, while the study by Juan I. Zanón-Martínez et al., which used regular camera trapping, reported a lower maximum density.