Studies of Cougar Population Density
| Study authors | Location | Methods | Study area (square kilometers) | Maximum density (cougars per 100 square kilometers) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Clarke | British Columbia (Canada) | radio-collar tracking | 3,045 | 0.72 |
| Veronica A. Quiroga et al. | Argentina | regular camera trapping | 1,882 | 1.26 |
| Richard A. Beausoleil et al. | Washington (United States) | biopsy darting | 7,939 | 2.40 |
| David M. Choate et al. | Utah (United States) | helicopter surveying | 1,300 | 10.24 |
Studies of the population density of cougars (Puma concolor) have yielded a range of results, which may in part reflect differences in the effectiveness of the methods that researchers have used in their studies. For example, the difference between the maximum population density reported by Ross Clarke and that reported by David M. Choate et al. might be artificially large if the use of __________