Back to forum
Verbal·Craft and Structure·Cross-Text Connections
hard
Text 1
Oil extraction and other human activities are sources of atmospheric methane (
), but, as Donald Wuebbles and Katherine Hayhoe have shown, so too are naturally occurring emissions, such as those from termite mounds. This biogenic is challenging to track given natural sources’ variability and spatial diffusion, but one promising approach is to use flux data from extant monitoring infrastructure as proxies for fluxes in unmonitored areas.

Text 2
Sparkle Malone and colleagues examined the United States’ network of eddy covariance (EC) towers—the equipment used to measure fluxes—and found that the towers are concentrated in particular ecological regions while many other land-cover types are sparsely monitored or absent entirely. Because the placement of the existing sites does not represent the full range of conditions that drive biogenic emissions, they cautioned that flux values measured at current locations cannot be assumed to hold for the unmonitored areas they are meant to stand in for.
Based on the texts, how would Malone et al. (Text 2) most likely respond to the claim in the underlined portion of Text 1?
A
By disputing that biogenic fluxes from unobserved areas can be reliably derived from observed fluxes
B
By disagreeing about the importance of quantifying biogenic fluxes
C
By challenging the assumption that there are significant biogenic fluxes that existing monitoring infrastructure fails to capture
D
By arguing that existing monitoring technology is not sensitive enough to detect biogenic fluxes